The application of digital Patient and Public Involvement in dementia research should take into account technological, involvementability, resources and ethical and welfare conditions
Guidance
Digital Patient and Public InvolvementInvolving ordinary people and local communities in the planning, commissioning, delivery and evaluation of the health and social care services they receive. (abbreviated to PPI) (e-PPIElectronic/digital Patient and Public Involvement More) provides opportunities, for example, in terms of saving time, not having to travel to meetings, and fewer organizational tasks, such as transporting PPIPatient and Public Involvement Involving ordinary people and local communities in the planning, commissioning, delivery and evaluation of the health and social care services they receive. representatives to the meeting venue. However, to optimize digital Patient and Public InvolvementInvolving ordinary people and local communities in the planning, commissioning, delivery and evaluation of the health and social care services they receive. (abbreviated to PPI) (e-PPIElectronic/digital Patient and Public Involvement More) in dementia research, technological, involvement ability, resources and ethical and welfare conditions should be taken into account.
Explanation and Examples
When applying digital PPIPatient and Public Involvement Involving ordinary people and local communities in the planning, commissioning, delivery and evaluation of the health and social care services they receive. in dementia research it is important to consider four key areas of conditions. Taking these areas into account will allow identifying improvements that can be made to e-PPIElectronic/digital Patient and Public Involvement More to make it more effective and efficient, and problems avoided (see also Figure 2):
-
Technological: refers to constraints, preferences, and opportunities of the used technology.
Improvements: virtual platforms must be considered as part of the toolkit to perform PPIPatient and Public Involvement Involving ordinary people and local communities in the planning, commissioning, delivery and evaluation of the health and social care services they receive.; hybrid options (digital and face-to-face) must be provided.
-
Resources: is associated with personal resources such as fatigue or personal resilience; professional resources such as increased demands on conducting PPIPatient and Public Involvement Involving ordinary people and local communities in the planning, commissioning, delivery and evaluation of the health and social care services they receive. online; and other resources such as costs of coproduction platforms, phone credit, printing, software, or budget for more frequent meetings.
Improvements: make sure additional resources are included such as technical support staff or reimbursements for online meeting costs; face-to-face training could help participants to learn how to use the platform.
-
Involvementability: refers to requirements that are related to the success of a design task or process. How involvement differs in a digital space or how it can be translated to different populations online.
Improvements: smaller groups can help prevent attention wandering; limit the number of people on the screen.
-
Ethical and welfare: describes aspects such as the welfare of public contributors (people with dementia and caregivers), digital exclusion, impact on social communication, data security, etc.
Improvements: consider the configuration and history of the group when choosing which platform and approach (online, face-to-face or blended) to use; follow-up of public contributors’ welfare
Themes
ePPI Patient and Public Involvement
Target groups
Family carers People living with dementia PPI coordinators Public contributors ResearchersType of evidence
Mauricio Molinari Ulate (DISTINCT ESR7)
Qualitative study, online focus groups, digital PPI
References
Molinari-Ulate, M., Woodcock, R., Smith, I. et al. Insights on conducting digital patient and public involvement in dementia research during the COVID-19 pandemic: supporting the development of an “E-nabling digital co-production” framework. Res Involv Engagem 8, 33 (2022). doi.org/10.1186/s40900-022-00371-9